[ABE-L] Sobre o Google Scholar

Raydonal Ospina rayospina em gmail.com
Qui Dez 22 21:02:47 -03 2016


Prezados.

Aproveitando a discussão recomendo a seguinte leitura

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frma.2016.00001/full

Saudações

On Dec 22, 2016 16:55, "Alejandro C. Frery" <acfrery em gmail.com> wrote:

> Boa tarde,
>
> Recomendo a leitura deste artigo, bem como das referências por ele
> citadas. Esse material lança dúvidas sérias quanto à pertinência do uso do
> Google Scholar como fonte de métricas bibliográficas.
>
> Alejandro
>
>
> @Article{GoogleScholarManipulation2014,
>  author    = {E. {Delgado L{\'{o}}pez-C{\'{o}}zar} and N.
> Robinson-Garc{\'{\i}}a and D. Torres-Salinas},
>  journal   = {Journal of the Association for Information Science and
> Technology},
>  pages     = {446--454},
>  title     = {The {G}oogle {S}cholar experiment: How to index false papers
> and manipulate bibliometric indicators},
>  volume    = {65},
>  year      = {2013},
>  number    = {3},
>  month     = {nov},
>  abstract  = {Google Scholar has been well received by the research
> community. Its promises of free, universal, and easy access to scientific
> literature coupled with the perception that it covers the social sciences
> and the humanities better than other traditional multidisciplinary
> databases have contributed to the quick expansion of Google Scholar
> Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: 2 new bibliometric products that
> offer citation data at the individual level and at journal level. In this
> article, we show the results of an experiment undertaken to analyze Google
> Scholar's capacity to detect citation-counting manipulation. For this, we
> uploaded 6 documents to an institutional web domain that were authored by a
> fictitious researcher and referenced all the publications of the members of
> the EC3 research group at the University of Granada. The detection by
> Google Scholar of these papers caused an outburst in the number of
> citations included in the Google Scholar Citations profiles of the authors.
> We discuss the effects of such an outburst and how it could affect the
> future development of such products, at both the individual level and the
> journal level, especially if Google Scholar persists with its lack of
> transparency.},
>  doi       = {10.1002/asi.23056},
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> abe mailing list
> abe em lists.ime.usp.br
> https://lists.ime.usp.br/listinfo/abe
>
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <https://lists.ime.usp.br/archives/abe/attachments/20161222/85feaf33/attachment.html>


Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão abe