[ABE-L] Fwd: {MEDSTATS} Thoughts on online resources for help with teaching medical statistics?

[Basilio De Braganca Pereira]

Enviado do meu iPhone

Início da mensagem encaminhada

> De: Joanne Ingram <joanneingram19 em gmail.com>
> Data: 16 de março de 2015 09:13:23 BRT
> Para: basiliopereira em gmail.com
> Assunto: Re: {MEDSTATS} Thoughts on online resources for help with teaching medical statistics?
> 
> Excellent thanks Basilio - this is very helpful.
> 
> Joanne
> 
>> On 13 March 2015 at 22:41, Basilio de Braganca Pereira <basiliopereira em gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dr Ingram 
>> 
>> I believe the analogy os diagnostic test and hypothesis test presented in 
>> 
>> Diamond GA, Forrester JS‐1983‐ Clinical trials and statistical verdicts: probable grounds for appeal. ANN.
>> Inter. Med. ,98, 385‐394
>> 
>> which shows P-value ~ 1- especificity  very clarifying for medical students; 
>> 
>> Also copying an editorial of the journal Significance (Dr Fisher ) it is interesting to point out that P-value should be bether  called IMPROBABILITY.
>> 
>> Basilio
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2015-03-13 9:11 GMT-03:00 Joanne Ingram <joanneingram19 em gmail.com>:
>>> As you probably know more and more people (students and professionals) are turning to free online resources for help with teaching and learning medical statistics.  
>>> 
>>> I am currently engaging in the process of completing a review of open access resources for teaching medical statistics  would be very interested to hear from anyone with thoughts on what makes a resource in this area good or poor.   If you are able it would be great if you could take time to consider the two issues below:
>>> 
>>> -              Have you ever conducted or come across a review of such resources and if so what criteria were used?
>>> 
>>> -              Do you have any suggestions for criteria which it would be prudent to include in such a review; in particular any thoughts on criteria which address issues like tests of assumptions, choice of tests, or reporting and interpreting statistics.  Is there anything you think must be included for a resource to be of true value?  Or are there any misconceptions, the inclusion of which would make a resource poor or even counterproductive.
>>> 
>>> Hopefully I will be able to publish my review to help those teaching medical statistics determine which of the extensive array of resources are actually helpful.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much for any comments you may have.
>>> 
>>> Dr Joanne Ingram
>>> 
>>> Research Associate in Medical Statistics 
>>> 
>>> Centre for Population Health Sciences 
>>> 
>>> University of Edinburgh
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> To post a new thread to MedStats, send email to MedStats em googlegroups.com .
>>> MedStats' home page is http://groups.google.com/group/MedStats .
>>> Rules: http://groups.google.com/group/MedStats/web/medstats-rules
>>> 
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MedStats" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to medstats+unsubscribe em googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> To post a new thread to MedStats, send email to MedStats em googlegroups.com .
>> MedStats' home page is http://groups.google.com/group/MedStats .
>> Rules: http://groups.google.com/group/MedStats/web/medstats-rules
>> 
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "MedStats" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/medstats/S3mGclIrRNc/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to medstats+unsubscribe em googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <https://lists.ime.usp.br/archives/abe/attachments/20150317/55df3c7b/attachment.html>